Now that the idea that the Maidan shootings were done by the police (Berkut) and the heavenly hundred martyrs were all victims of the shootings have been debunked, what is less well-publicized is that using a false-flag shooting of protestors to provoke regime change is not new.
The USA used this method in Venezuela to support regime change against Hugo Chavez, which clearly makes one suspicious that the US may have been behind the Maidan false-flag also.
The Dissident reports:
[https://the307.substack.com/p/how-policies-from-the-bi-parisian]
|
According to CNN journalist Otto Neustadtl, the opposition planned the false flag massacre before carrying it out, saying, “On the night of the 10th (of April 2002, one day before the coup), they phoned me and told me Otto, a video of Chavez is coming tomorrow, the 11th, the demonstrators will be diverted to Miraflores (presidential house) there will be some dead, and there will be a statement from a group of 20 military high command, asking the president to resign. In the morning of the 11th (of April 2002), they told me everything goes as planned, a video is coming, some dead are coming, and the military will speak out. I was there with the military that was giving the statement against President Chavez. I was there at least two hours before the first death occurred. In that rehearsal, they talked about the dead when the first death had not occurred”. Strangely, as journalist William Van Wagenen has documented, false flag sniper massacres were again carried out during several future U.S. regime change operations. |
FNN does not remember anyone in the MSM pointing out this inconvenient fact about past US-planning of false-flag shootings to support regime change when the copycat Maidan incident occurred.
But that would undermine the heroic narrative right?