The BBC is under fire from all directions following the publication of the Michael Prescott memo by the Telegraph.
[https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/11/06/read-devastating-internal-bbc-memo-in-full/]
Concerns have been raised about
At various times the BBC has been accused of being anti/pro Israel, anti/pro Trans, anti-Trump, having inadequate 'fact-checking'.
A BBC employee is currently suing a journalist for accusing him of pro-Israel bias:
[https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/11/06/raffi-berg-bbc-editor-sues-owen-jones-israel-bias]
The problem maybe not the BBC but who they are hiring - activists rather than journalists - who are then given a powerful platform to disseminate their agendised views rather like everyone is complaining about X being a platform for 'right-wing' views.
Everyone should know what to expect when they click on GB News or RT but if they are paying money for an 'objective' BBC then that's what they should get.
Why should the British public pay a license fee for content that is agenda-driven by activists?
It's a mystery.